home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ The Supreme Court / The Supreme Court.iso / pc / briefs / 1992 / 92_1750 / 1750r042.tif (.png) < prev    next >
Tagged Image File Format  |  1995-08-30  |  83KB  |  1696x2200
Labels: book | reckoner | sky | tree | windowpane
OCR: W. Woolworth Co Y. Contemporary Arts, Inc.. 344 U.S. 1 233 Petitioner contends, however, that Section 505 should not be construed to encourage copyright enforcement but rather be "neutral" between plaintiffs and defendants. ni view "the Copyright Act was not enacted provide mec hanism for enforcing and vindicating individual rights, but instead 'seI've[s] the purpose clarifying the scope of the limited monopoly created by the Copyright Act. But the Copyright Act is simply not " +sutral. this Court has noted, the Copyright Clause "describes both the obiective which Congress seek that is "the progress science and the aTs "the neans achieve hat through the provision enforceable rights T ard their assignees. Goldstein Catiformia 412 546. 555 (1973) Neither the Copyright Clause nor the Copyrigh ...